<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Be A Bad Arguer: The Sorites Paradox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drzoltan.com/how-to-be-a-bad-arguer-the-sorites-paradox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drzoltan.com/how-to-be-a-bad-arguer-the-sorites-paradox/</link>
	<description>Host of the Anti-Social Talk Show and Founder of the War On Fun Explains Why You Are ALL Doomed!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 17:34:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dr.occa</title>
		<link>http://www.drzoltan.com/how-to-be-a-bad-arguer-the-sorites-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-9171</link>
		<dc:creator>dr.occa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drzoltan.com/?p=333#comment-9171</guid>
		<description>crap!!!  the &quot;me&quot; before miserable should have been &quot;be&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>crap!!!  the &#8220;me&#8221; before miserable should have been &#8220;be&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr.occa</title>
		<link>http://www.drzoltan.com/how-to-be-a-bad-arguer-the-sorites-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-9170</link>
		<dc:creator>dr.occa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drzoltan.com/?p=333#comment-9170</guid>
		<description>please make a list of acceptable socialist programs.  then state why they are acceptable to you.  then state why they SHOULD be acceptable to others.  then base the SHOULD reasoning on a moral standard that ALL should abide by.  Then state why ALL should abide by YOUR particular standard.

maybe then we can discuss which (if any) parts of socialism are &quot;acceptable&quot; to legislate.

i still believe the vast majority of us are motivated by envy which can and often does lead to &quot;class&quot; envy.  either me miserable with what &quot;little&quot; you have or be happy for what you DO have and happy for others who have EARNED more than you and me.

you&#039;ll show real growth when you can recognize that people from other than YOUR PARTICULAR POLITICAL CIRCLE may have good if not better ideas.  it&#039;s called humility which is only possible with maturity.

promote all of the country not just your particular subset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please make a list of acceptable socialist programs.  then state why they are acceptable to you.  then state why they SHOULD be acceptable to others.  then base the SHOULD reasoning on a moral standard that ALL should abide by.  Then state why ALL should abide by YOUR particular standard.</p>
<p>maybe then we can discuss which (if any) parts of socialism are &#8220;acceptable&#8221; to legislate.</p>
<p>i still believe the vast majority of us are motivated by envy which can and often does lead to &#8220;class&#8221; envy.  either me miserable with what &#8220;little&#8221; you have or be happy for what you DO have and happy for others who have EARNED more than you and me.</p>
<p>you&#8217;ll show real growth when you can recognize that people from other than YOUR PARTICULAR POLITICAL CIRCLE may have good if not better ideas.  it&#8217;s called humility which is only possible with maturity.</p>
<p>promote all of the country not just your particular subset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubblesort</title>
		<link>http://www.drzoltan.com/how-to-be-a-bad-arguer-the-sorites-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-6490</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubblesort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drzoltan.com/?p=333#comment-6490</guid>
		<description>Good post.  I hate to nitpick, but I would categorize this as as an example of explaining by naming rather than an ad-hominem attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.  I hate to nitpick, but I would categorize this as as an example of explaining by naming rather than an ad-hominem attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.drzoltan.com/how-to-be-a-bad-arguer-the-sorites-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-4191</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drzoltan.com/?p=333#comment-4191</guid>
		<description>bravo. I&#039;ve been arguing this point with many a pinhead, but felt that I lacked a streamlined delivery that I think you outlined quite well. 

Long live Dr. Zoltan&#039;s obsession with logical fallacies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bravo. I&#8217;ve been arguing this point with many a pinhead, but felt that I lacked a streamlined delivery that I think you outlined quite well. </p>
<p>Long live Dr. Zoltan&#8217;s obsession with logical fallacies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
